GHC

Global Human Commons
What about us?


Elinora Olström

U.N.
Index and Tabs: INSPIRE Skype address: sbfemile sbfemile

Global Union for the baseline needs for Life and Wealth

Cash Register Nings: (become local site mgr)
Like the birds have the sky and food, and fishes have the waters and food, mankind will have "free" housing, food, education, and recreation

 

Coalitions and cooperations:
- All Win Network
- Antroposphere Inst.
- ARINA
- Be Commons
- Centre for Global Negotiations
- COMMONS CAMPUS
- Development4all
- E2Us
- Essence Admin
- Essence Sum
- Global Commons Trust
- Inst. for Planetary Synthesis 
- Kosmos Journal
- Nature College
- One Childs Village
- On the Commons
- P2P Foundation
- Recyclus
- Share the World’s Resources
- StarrPort
- SUM Foundation
- Summit Speak,
- Trees Have Rights Too
- URSULA
- VipCure
- Wiser Earth
- World Citizens Action
- Association of World Citizens
- Yours to? Mail us your URL!

Those Letters were sended to:

Abdullah II 
Archbishop Francis Assisi Chullikatt
Carl Gustaf XVI
D M Jayaratne 
Dilma Rousseff 
Dr. Elmi Ahmed Duale
Evo Morales 
General Daniel Bernard Healy
Margrethe II 
Miss. Alya Ahmed S. Al-Thani
Mr Gunnar Pálsson
Mr. Abdelrazag E. Gouider
Mr. Abderrahim Ould Hadrami
Mr. Abdeslam Jaidi
Mr. Abdou Salam Diallo
Mr. Abdullah Hussain Haroon
Mr. Abdurrahman Mohamed Shalgham
Mr. Aboubacar Ibrahim Abani
Mr. Afelee F. Pita
Mr. Agshin Mehdiyev
Mr. Ahmad Allam-mi
Mr. Ahmed Khaleel
Mr. Ahmed Ouyahia 
Mr. Alejandro D. Wolff
Mr. Alexander Lomaia
Mr. Alexander Lukashenko 
Mr. Alexandru Cujba
Mr. Alfred Moungara Moussotsi
Mr. Ali Bongo Ondimba 
Mr. Ali'ioaiga Feturi Elisaia
Mr. Alpha Ibrahima Sow
Mr. Aman Hassen Bame
Mr. Amjad Hussain B. Sial
Mr. Anastassis Mitsialis
Mr. Anatolio Ndong Mba
Mr. Andrew Goledzinowski
Mr. Andrus Ansip 
Mr. Andry Rajoelina 
Mr. Antonio Bernardini
Mr. Antonio Bernardini
Mr. Antonio Pedro Monteiro Lima
Mr. Araya Desta
Mr. Artur Rasizade 
Mr. Asif Ali Zardari 
Mr. Atoki Ileka
Mr. Baldwin Spencer 
Mr. Bamir Topi 
Mr. Barack Obama 
Mr. Bashar Ja'afari
Mr. Benedict Lawrence Lukwiya
Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu 
Mr. Bhumibol Adulyadej 
Mr. Borut Pahor 
Mr. Brian Cowen Taoiseach
Mr. Brian G. Bowler
Mr. Brian G. Bowler
Mr. Bruce Golding 
Mr. Carlos Enrique García González
Mr. Carlos Enrique García González
Mr. Carlos Michelen
Mr. Carsten Staur
Mr. Cesare Maria Ragaglini
Mr. Cesare Maria Ragaglini
Mr. Charles Thembani Ntwaagae
Mr. Crispin S. Gregoire
Mr. Crispin S. Gregoire
Mr. Csaba Körösi
Mr. Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman
Mr. Dalius Čekuolis
Mr. Daniel António
Mr. Dawit Yohannes
Mr. Dean Barrow 
Mr. Dési Bouterse 
Mr. Diego Morejón
Mr. Djamel Moktefi
Mr. Donald Tusk 
Mr. Eduardo Gálvez
Mr. Eduardo Ulibarri
Mr. Emil Boc 
Mr. Enriquillo A. del Rosario Ceballos
Mr. Erik Laursen
Mr. Ertugrul Apakan
Mr. Eshagh Al Habib
Mr. Federico Alberto Cuello Camilo
Mr. Feodor Starčević
Mr. Ferit Hoxha
Mr. Ferit Hoxha
Mr. Fernando Alzate
Mr. France-Albert Rene
Mr. Francisco Carrión-Mena
Mr. Francisco Cortorreal
Mr. Frederick D. Barton
Mr. Freundel Stuart 
Mr. Garen Nazarian
Mr. Gary Francis Quinlan
Mr. George Abela 
Mr. George Wilfred Talbot
Mr. Georgi Parvanov 
Mr. Gérard Araud
Mr. Gert Rosenthal
Mr. Gert Rosenthal
Mr. Gilles Rivard
Mr. Goodluck Jonathan 
Mr. Haim Waxman
Mr. Hamad ibn Isa Al Khalifah 
Mr. Hamid Al Bayati
Mr. Hamid Al Bayati
Mr. Hamid Karzai 
Mr. Han Song Ryol
Mr. Hardeep Singh Puri
Mr. Hardeep Singh Puri
Mr. Hasan Kleib
Mr. Henry Leonard Mac-Donald
Mr. Herman Schaper
Mr. Hernán Tejeira
Mr. Hubert Ingraham 
Mr. Ibrahim O.A. Dabbashi
Mr. Ilham Aliyev 
Mr. Islam Karimov 
Mr. Ismael Abraão Gaspar Martins
Mr. Ivan Barbaliç
Mr. Ivo Josipovic 
Mr. Jacob Zuma 
Mr. Jaime Hermida Castillo
Mr. Jan Grauls
Mr. Jarmo Viinanen
Mr. Jean Wesley Cazeau
Mr. Jean-Francis Régis Zinsou
Mr. Jens Stoltenberg 
Mr. João Maria Cabral
Mr. John Ache 
Mr. John Key 
Mr. John McNee
Mr. Jorge Argüello
Mr. Jorge Flores
Mr. Jorge Valero Briceño
Mr. José Alberto Briz Gutiérrez
Mr. José Alberto Briz Gutiérrez
Mr. José Antonio Dos Santos
Mr. José Eduardo dos Santos 
Mr. José Filipe Moraes Cabral
Mr. José Luis Cancela
Mr. José Mujica 
Mr. José Sócrates 
Mr. Joseph Estrada
Mr. Joseph Goddard
Mr. Joseph Goddard
Mr. Juan Manuel Santos 
Mr. Julio César Arriola Ramírez
Mr. Julio Rafael Escalona Ojeda
Mr. Kamla Persad Bissessar 
Mr. Karolos Papoulias 
Mr. Kazuo Kodama
Mr. Ken Kanda
Mr. Kenny Anthony
Mr. Kim Bong-hyun
Mr. Kodjo Menan
Mr. Kodjo Menan
Mr. Kosal Sea
Mr. Latif Tuah
Mr. Lazarous Kapambwe
Mr. Lee Myungbak 
Mr. Lennart Meri
Mr. Léo Mérorès
Mr. Leonel Fernandez Reyna

 

Letter I RIO+20: Shifting to a Green Economy: Measures We Can Take - Nov. 27, 2011

Letter II Rio+20: Measures for poverty alleviation - Dec. 4, 2011

Letter III Rio+20: The Power of a Global Commons - Dec. 11, 2011

Attachments: UN documents E/2010/NGO/29 and E/2011/NGO/126

-------

Letter from The Pachamama Alliance - Jon Love - Dec. 14, 2011

 

Letter I RIO+20:
Shifting to a Green Economy: Measures We Can Take
Nov. 27, 2011

Immediate Measures We Can Take
To Shift to a Green Economy

Suggestions for Rio +20 from Commons Action for the United Nations, a network of CSOs, including the Institute for Planetary Synthesis and the Association of World Citizens.

#title# #name#,

It is urgent that we shift immediately from an economy at war with nature to one based on a global-commons approach. As mentioned in UN documents E/2010/NGO/29 and E/2011/NGO/126 (both attached), the strength of such an economy would be measured in terms of the well-being of nature and all people and their communities.

For these lie at the very heart of every economy. They are its very building blocks.

This is the first of a series of letters outlining measures we can take to bring about this shift.

We call on Governments at Rio+20 to create a Panel of Experts from the UN Secretariat to develop a step-by-step plan for the implementation of a commons-based economy. This panel would consult with Governments, relevant IGOs and CSOs, Major Groups and other stakeholders to ensure the greatest possible support for their work.

We also request that you pass on the information in this email for use by your negotiator at the upcoming series of Intersessionals and Formal Informals in preparation for Rio+20.

Examples where such a commons approach is already being implemented include:

  • Ø many of the approximately 1500 Sarvodaya communities, thousands of ecovillages, transition towns, cooperatives (1 billion people are already officially members), and indigenous communities. All of these groups use forms of collaborative decision making, planning and implementation by community members. As well, the benefits from such processes are equitably shared by all members of the community. (For more information: http://www.sarvodaya.org/; ecovillage.org; transitionnetwork.org)
  • Ø the Participatory Budget Process that was initially developed in Porto Alegre;
  • Ø the participatory local Agenda 21 sustainable community planning processes, where interested stakeholders help in developing a plan for the community to become as sustainable as possible;

Although commons management of natural resources have decreased as Public and Private Sectors have enclosed commons lands, Ecuador’s new Constitution is an example to the sustainable development community worldwide which grants Rights to Nature to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles. Also the international commons movement was inspired by the speeches by Dr. Maria Fernandez, Esponsa, Garces, Minister of Patrinomy at the International Commons Conference in Berlin 1-2 November, 2010.

Seven Characteristics of a Global-Commons Approach to Sustainable Development

  1. Commons Goods: those fruits of nature and society that everyone needs to survive and thrive. These include: the atmosphere, oceans, forests, biodiversity, all species of life, natural systems, and minerals; food, water, energy, spiritual and healthcare; and, information, art, culture, society, technology, free news media, trade and finance systems.
  2. Commoners: Groups of people who share the resources (users, producers, managers, providers).
  3. Commoning : inclusive, participatory and transparent forms of decision making and rules governing access to, and benefit from these commons resources.
  4. Boundaries: specifying community membership and the extent of the resource.
  5. Value: created through the preservation or production coming from these commons goods and resources.
  6. Recognition that the Earth is a living system of interconnected components on which all life depends. (UN Resolution 65/164 on Harmony with Nature.)
  7. Adoption of an all-win approach to life that takes into account the well being of all people as well as nature, as opposed to the win/lose and human-centred win/win orientations.

The United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) provides a course on the commons and goes into more detail about the work in this area by Elinor Ostrom who was awarded the 2009 Nobel Prize in Economic Science. http://www.cooperationcommons.com/node/361

A global, commons-based approach to a sustainable economy has the following important advantages:

  1. It fosters responsibility for the switch to sustainable-living from the grassroots up. All stakeholders are directly involved in decisions regarding the natural and social resources they, themselves, need to survive and prosper.
  2. It enables Governments to build on thousands of sustainable-living initiatives which can begin to form the basis for a sustainable green economy that is supported by their peoples.
  3. It also would help to forge collaborative working relationships with the rapidly increasing “Occupy” and similar demonstrations that are occurring around the world.

Concrete Measures to Bring About a Shift to a Commons-Based Global Economy

  1. Shifting from present economic indicators measuring production and consumption to ones measuring the well-being of people and nature. These indicators could include those mentioned in the UN Human Development Reports from 1990 onward; and, in other UN contexts, those mentioned in Germany’s Yearbook, Bhutan’s Happiness Index, etc.
  2. Extending GA resolution A/HRC/18/L.1 declaring the human right to clean drinking water and sanitation to clean air and other fruits of nature and society that each person needs to be able to survive and thrive.
  3. Applying the precautionary principle, including with respect to geo-engineering.
  4. Internalization of the full life-cycle and true environmental costs of production and consumption in order to address the causes rather than simply the symptoms of environmental degradation. (See also the Cradle to Cradle certification system: www.c2ccertified.org)
  5. Implementing a global footprint to assess economic performance in all sectors and at all levels, including corporations. (See also: www.footprintnetwork.org)
  6. Elimination of fossil fuel and other subsidies which distort the market.
  7. Recognizing the importance of international agreements such as the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Geneva Conventions, International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights, Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Kyoto Protocol and associated Work plans, Agenda 21, and Johannesburg Plan of Implementation. Each of these promote democratic participation in planning sustainable development.
  8. Recognizing that ecocide is a crime against peace and life, like genocide – except that ecocide relates to harm done to nature, including animal and plant species. Ecocide should be prosecuted under universal jurisdiction. (For more information: www.treeshaverightstoo.com)
  9. Creating a World Environmental Court.
  10. Recognizing in national constitutions that, as well as individual people and corporations, Mother Nature has rights. Infringements on these rights should be prosecutable under universal jurisdiction, as is already the case in Bolivia and Ecuador.
  11. Implementing the all-win principle in all governmental decision-making. This recognizes that, since all people and all of nature are parts of one integrated whole, the well-being of all people and all of nature are essential to us all. (See also www.worldcitizensaction.com)
  12. Instituting open source and General Public Licenses – commons-based alternatives to Intellectual Property Rights. The latter have begun to reduce humanity's capacity to adapt to emerging issues and global challenges. The extension of their applicability is also used now to hamper progress and further enclose the commons and should not be accepted or permitted. (See also: http://onthecommons.org/about-commons; www.opensource.org and www.gnu.org)
  13. Establishing a commons-based approach to education at the bottom of the pyramid –i.e., children in all nations – to ensure that commons principles are instituted for future generations. This basic human right of education in the formative years is included in Article 26 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights.
  14. Establishing – where appropriate – common property rights held by local communities over resources on which they depend. This would include forests, grazing lands, bodies of water, groundwater, and fisheries. This can ensure that the people who have a long-term stake in the preservation of these resources would have control over them, obtain benefits from them, and internalize any externalities caused by individual community members into the decision-making of the community as a whole.

Signed:

Dr. Lisinka Ulatowska for:

Association of World Citizens; Institute for Planetary Synthesis, the All-Win Network, Commons Action for the United Nations, the Earth Rights Institute, Kosmos Associates, Inc.; International Association for the Advancement of Innovative Approaches to Global Challenges; Climate Change Network, PeterEarth.org, Keepers of the Waters.

For more information please reply to
Dr. Lisinka Ulatowska, info@worldcitizensaction.com

 

Letter II Rio+20:
Measures for poverty alleviation
Dec. 4, 2011

Immediate Measures We Can Take
To Alleviate Poverty

Suggestions for Rio+20 from Commons Action for the United Nations, a network of CSOs which includes the Institute for Planetary Synthesis and the Association of World Citizens.

#title# #name#,

Converging crises around the world are escalating poverty and social inequity. As a result, a rapidly growing number of people have been showing their concern in demonstrations everywhere. This can be changed!

This, our second email to you, focuses on measures that can be taken to restore and regenerate nature, alleviate poverty, and mobilize people worldwide to help bring about an economic and social shift from the bottom up. Such a commons-based economy would give all people fair access to commons goods – the fruits of nature and society all of us need to survive and prosper.

We are calling on Governments to create an international (High Level or UN) Panel of Experts to develop a step-by-step plan for the creation of a worldwide commons-based economy and global community. This panel would consult with Governments, and relevant IGOs, CSOs, Major Groups and other stakeholders.

We also request that you pass on the information in this email for use by your negotiator at the upcoming series of Intersessionals and Formal Informals in preparation for Rio+20.

We hope the perspectives and measures mentioned in this email will support #country# in playing a proactive role in the negotiations leading up to the Final Agreement issuing from Rio+20.

The measures discussed below expand on the measures to help shift to a commons-based economy that we included in our first email to you on November 27 (Subject: I. Rio+20 Measures for a sustainable economy); and UN Document E/2010/NGO/29: People and commons: global partnerships, missing links (attached).

Making this change now is essential since people and nature are the building blocks of every economy. If we don’t move quickly and thoroughly, we threaten the very fabric of our society.

What is a Commons?

According to Elinor Ostrom who received the 2009 Nobel Prize for Economic Science, a commons consists minimally of three basic elements:

  • 1) a community or loosely connected network of people (called commoners) who manage
  • 2) fruits of nature and society such as the water, earth, air, biodiversity, information, and culture, needed for them to thrive (commons goods), using
  • 3) open, transparent, participatory and inclusive forms of decision making so that the interests of present and future generations are ensured. This is termed commoning.

These can form harmonious building blocks for a global commons-based economy to the degree participants in these communities also live according to the all-win principle. This states that since each of us and nature are parts of one integrated whole, the well-being of all people and all of nature are essential to us all.

Commons-based economies already exist in millions of locations worldwide in almost every sphere of social interaction. In our first email we mentioned communities that use alternative local currencies to enable local exchanges and trade to restore flagging local economies (e.g. www.gmlets.u-net.com) and those which counter environmental and social degradation by experimenting with commons-based lifestyles.

These include indigenous communities where there is a sacred bond with nature, 15000 Sarvodaya communities (See (www.sarvodaya.org); ecovillages (See ecovillage.org), transition towns (See transitionnetwork.org); and cooperatives (one billion people are already officially members).

Another notable example is a project of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Called GEO-Cities, one of its main objectives is to establish an integrated environment assessment process that acknowledges the links between environmental conditions and human activities. (See: www.grid.unep.ch/activities/assessment/geo/geo_cities.php).

Other ways the commons approach is thriving:

  • Ø The Slow Food and the Community Supported Agriculture movements, community gardens and farmer’s markets:
  • Ø Insurance and banking cooperatives;
  • Ø Neighborhood Watches and volunteer groups where citizens add to the resources
  • of local police forces to increase the safety of communities;
  • Ø The unarmed civilian protection of civilians and peace that functions often
  • internationally. (See: www.nonviolentpeaceforce.org; www.peacebrigades.org);
  • Ø Hundreds of successful commons groups for managing fisheries, forests and irrigation;
  • Ø The acequias in Spain, the Andes, northern Mexico, and the modern-day American
  • Southwest--community-operated canals that carry snow runoff or river water to
  • distant fields;
  • Ø The ejidos in Mexico where the government promotes the use of communal land
  • shared by the people of the community;
  • Ø Wikipedia, the Internet open encyclopedia with almost four million entries in over
  • 160 languages;
  • Ø Flickr, the Internet photo management and sharing application where people show
  • off millions of their favorite photos and videos to the world;
  • Ø More than 6000 open publishers;
  • Ø Open Educational Resources, an initiative which provides teaching and learning
  • materials online for everyone to use;
  • Ø OpenCourseWare, an online program operated by the Massachusetts Institute of
  • Technology (MIT), offers free lecture notes, exams and videos for over 2000
  • courses studied at the school;
  • Ø Many millions of online texts, videos and musical works provided under Creative
  • Commons licenses that enable easy sharing; and,
  • Ø The free and open source computer software community that creates and provides
  • a large and varied software marketplace.

These are just a few of the millions of examples of commons that exist worldwide that can be used as a starting point for a commons-based economy. It would be an economy for “the 99 percent” AND the “one percent,” one that would alleviate poverty and mobilize people from the bottom up to restore and regenerate nature.

A commons-based economy would have the following advantages:

  • 1) It would reach into all levels of society with the potential to alleviate poverty and produce resources needed by communities at the local level, thus also lessening the need for costly transportation.
  • 2) Local, regional, national and global businesses would benefit because the population as a whole would be prospering.
  • 3) The care of commons goods would be in the hands of those who are most invested in preserving them for present and coming generations – countering exploitation by individuals and corporate entities.
  • 4) People would be encouraged to adopt sustainable lifestyles because they would have a sense of shared responsibility and an awareness of the way their lives impact others.
  • 5) Working together as commoners would generate creativity, community cohesiveness, and constructive relationships among community members, resulting in greater harmony and political stability.
  • 6) Where governments are limited by national jurisdictions, regional conflicts for resources could be resolved by commons functioning across nationalboundaries.
  • 7) It would lead to the fulfilment of all of the rights contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It could also give people freedom and a sense of inner peace. This will help to overcome the challenge of both spiritual and material poverty which, in turn, is also a precondition for establishing a sustainable green economy.
  • 8) There would be little or no impetus for people to take to the streets to demonstrate because they would be empowered wherever they live to produce in their own unique ways those goods and services they need to live sustainably. Also, International Monetary Fund austerity measures would not be necessary and the uprisings now taking place as a result of them would cease.

Empowering the “Grass Roots” to Alleviate Poverty and Gain Social Equity

In our first email to you we suggested 12 measures that could be taken to shift to a sustainable, commons-based economy. The following measures build on this list to focus specifically on the mobilization of people for poverty alleviation and greater social equity.

Setting the stage

  • 1) Shifting from current economic indicators measuring production and consumption to ones measuring the well-being of people and nature. This could include the Gross Happiness Index used by Bhutan and similar approaches being implemented by China and under consideration by the UK, France, the US, and others. (See our first email)
  • 2) Implementing a global footprint to assess economic performance in all sectors and at all levels, including corporations. (See also: www.footprintnetwork.org) and our first email).
  • 3) Initiating an Ecosystem Health Index which would reflect the indigenous value for planning for many generations into the future. If the Ecosystem Health Index is high in an area then we can expect the Human Development Index to be high and improving.
  • 4) Replacing unequal power structures with forms of governance by and for all people. This would involve implementing Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (people shall be the basis of authority of government). This would require establishing more reciprocal input between citizens and governments to communicate best practices and to ensure citizens' support for controversial governmental decisions.
  • 5) Opening all UN meetings to input by relevant stake-holders and measuring each meeting with a Democracy Index reflecting the percentage of time allowed for governments representing the world’s peoples in proportion to total population. Here indigenous governments must be included.
  • 6) Implementing the all-win principle in all governmental decision-making which emphasizes that the well-being of all people and all of nature are essential to us all. (See above and also: www.worldcitizensaction.com).

Developing a Firm Foundation for Peoples Participation in a Commons-Based Economy

Many see the commons as subject to natural law. Measures to expand its legitimacy include:

  • 7) Establishing – where appropriate – common property rights held by local communities over resources on which they depend. These would include forests, grazing lands, bodies of water, groundwater, and fisheries. This would ensure that the people who have a long-term stake in the preservation of these resources would have control over them, obtain benefits from them, and internalize any externalities.
  • 8) Encouraging the creation of Social Charters to affirm the sovereignty of human beings over their means of sustenance and well-being arising through a customary or emerging identification with an ecology, a cultural resource area, a social need, or a form of collective labour. These charters are covenants and institutions negotiated by commons communities for the protection and sustenance of their resources. They use a commoning approach to ensure that community access to — and sovereignty over — their own commons is maintained and that the interests of all stakeholders are represented.
  • 9) Since a commons approach to sustainable development requires that all people have access to those fruits of nature and society that they need to survive and prosper, commons goods would be managed and equitably shared among all people, as follows:
  • · A strictly enforced cap would be placed on the use of depletable commons goods and resources.
  • · Trusts would then be established to oversee the caps and manage the resource.
  • · The amount of each cap would be determined and set by the stakeholders of each resource. These trusts would be located either within a state or be trans-border depending on the extent of both the resource and the community of interest;
  • · Permits for the use of what is available once the cap has been put in place would then be auctioned at source enabling the cost to be spread among all subsequent users and avoiding the complex task of pricing each depletable resource;
  • · Income from these commons resources would then be used to protect and restore the resource and reimburse those negatively affected by their use;
  • · A small percentage would go in part to the government to invest in a trust to transition to a sustainable future, and in part to a global trust to restore any damage to the global commons (air, water, land), and/or to provide a basic income for all people.

Broadly speaking, the assessment of commons rent by trusts around the world would require three significant changes:

  • · Governments would shift their primary emphasis away from issuing corporate charters and licensing the private sector and, instead, move toward approving social charters (see #8 above) and open licenses for resource preservation and social and cultural production processes through commons trusts managed by those who would cultivate and protect commonly held resources.
  • · Commons trusts would exercise a fiduciary duty to preserve natural, genetic and material commons (such as minerals, natural systems, water, air, land, and biodiversity) and to protect, create or regenerate solar, social, cultural and intellectual commons (such as YouTube, Wikipedia, and the Internet itself), yet may also decide to rent a proportion of these resource rights to businesses.
  • · Businesses could then rent the rights to extract and produce a resource from a commons trust (governing, say, a forest, land, or lake, etc.), thus creating profits and positive externalities through innovation, competitive products and services, and adjustment of the market to the actual costs of resources. However, consent to the use of a commons would first have to be granted by those who are protecting and/or depending upon a commons resource.
  • · Profits made by businesses can be taxed by Governments.
  • 10) Fostering cost-efficient sustainability and the self-sufficiency of commons communities dedicated to sustainable living by encouraging communication and collaboration between them and linkages with free or cost-effective commons initiatives, including the use of:
  • · alternative currencies to revive flagging local economies; and,
  • · the Internet, Wikipedia and YouTube to exchange inspirational practices and foster constructive and informed communications between commons groups. The more that constructive communications exist between commons groups from local through global levels, the more commoners will be empowered to combat poverty.

Expanding Education to Promote Effective Grass Roots Participation

(Please also refer to UN Doc. E/2011/NGO/126: Education for World Stewardship for the Benefit of All, which is attached. This provides a more comprehensive list)

Measures include:

  • 11) Embedding the commons and commons approaches at all levels of education to ensure that commons principles are also implemented by future generations. This would require universally adjusting curricula and taking steps to provide:
  • · understanding and application of the all-win perspective which emphasizes that – since all people and nature are parts of an integrated whole – the well-being of all people and of nature are essential to us all;
  • · tools for deep listening and peaceful conflict resolution;
  • · resources for individual empowerment to bring about creative and constructive change;
  • · means of providing all levels of government and the United Nations with constructive feedback on the needs and creative solutions of people.

We strongly believe it is possible to build a global commons-based community that is capable of eradicating poverty and creating social equity. But this will depend on a high level of communications and collaboration between commons communities at all levels and a strong foundation based on implementing as comprehensively as possible the measures we have suggested in our two emails.

We are counting on your support to help accomplish this huge step forward.

Signed:

Association of World Citizens,
Institute for Planetary Synthesis,
Commons Action for the United Nations,
Global Commons Trust,
All Win Network,
Zambuling Institute for Human Transformation,
Earthrights Institute,
Global Ecovillage Network,
International Union for the Land Value Tax and Free Trade,
International Association for the Advancement of Innovative Approaches,
PeterEarth.org,
Keepers of the Water,
WE the World,
Citizens for a UN Peoples Parliamentary Assembly,
Empower the UN.

For more information, please contact:

Dr. Lisinka Ulatowska info@worldcitizensaction.com

 

Letter III Rio+20:
The Power of a Global Commons
Dec. 11, 2011

Suggestions for Rio+20 from Commons Action for the United Nations, a network of CSOs which includes the Institute for Planetary Synthesis and the Association of World Citizens.

A Thriving Global Commons Empowers Both the Public and the Private Sectors

#title# #name#,

Rio+20 will attempt to reverse the breakdowns of three interconnected global systems: the economy, the environment and society.

These breakdowns are a result of the combined actions of all people. Therefore, they cannot be tackled effectively without the full participation of the people – in partnership with governments and corporations (the public and private sectors respectively.)

Faced with escalating crises, where the public and private sectors have sought to work together while people were increasingly marginalized, people have started to work together in diverse forms of commons. These commons seem to be coming to grips with the pending crises by dealing with their root causes.

We are confident that the insights developed in this document on the critical role that a commons-based global economy can play in solving today’s problems will support #country# as it takes a proactive and constructive role in the negotiations leading up to Rio+20 and at Rio+20 itself. We believe they can strongly influence an outcome that will abundantly benefit #country# as well as the whole world.

We are calling on Governments to create an international (High Level or UN) Panel of Experts to develop a step-by-step plan for the creation of a worldwide all-win commons-based economy and global community which might, for instance, take among others, the form of a Second Chamber within the United Nations. This panel would consult with Governments, and relevant IGOs, CSOs, Major Groups and other stakeholders.

We also request that you pass on the information in this email for use by your negotiator at the upcoming series of Intersessionals and Formal Informals in preparation for Rio+20.

Why a Commons-Based Global Economy Holds the Key to Empowering the Public and Private Sectors

Governments (which we can refer to as the Public Sector) are constrained by the limits of their jurisdictions while the interlocking crises they must deal with are both global in scope and express themselves quite differently in diverse localities. For these reasons, solutions must ultimately come from the citizens who are part of the many diverse communities and whose working relationships and interpersonal friendships connect them to people across national and other boundaries.

Governments must therefore work, not only with their own citizens and all other governments, but with people worldwide if they are to be effective.

The Private Sector is unable to solve global crises because it has a paramount need to make a profit for the stockholders who fund the many varied corporate entities. Unfortunately, this sector has so often profited at the expense of people and the wellbeing of the planet that a greatly increasing percentage of people are rapidly becoming economically marginalized. As a result, in both developed and developing countries alike, they are taking to the streets in protest against corporate greed and social inequity.

Where people cannot afford to buy goods and services, markets dwindle and business suffers. Corporations rely on both the prosperity and the goodwill of people to function.

Almost magically and in a profound demonstration of the human will to rise above failure, people are increasingly taking things into their own hands to overcome the limitations of the Public and Private Sectors. For many years now – and largely working independently of each other – they have been forming the beginnings of a Commons Sector which holds the promise of enabling good governance and socially responsible business.

A commons has three basic characteristics:

1) It consists of communities or loosely connected networks of people (called commoners).

2) These commoners manage the fruits of nature and society that they need to survive and thrive (commons goods) such as fishing grounds, security, information and culture.

3) They manage these goods using open, transparent, participatory, inclusive forms of decision making so that the interests of all stakeholders are ensured. This is termed commoning.

The underlying idea that enables diverse commoners to function in harmony is a belief in, and dedication to living according to the all-win principle:

Since each of us and nature are parts of one integrated whole, the wellbeing of all people and all of nature are essential to us all.

Cooperating in this way, they are forming harmonious building blocks for a commons-based global economy.

Shifting to a sustainable, commons-based “green” economy

As mentioned in our earlier emails, there are already thousands of communities where people are living sustainably in a form of commons. These include many indigenous communities worldwide; approximately 15000 Sarvodaya communities; hundreds of Eco-Villages; Transition Towns; GEO-Cities – a project of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); and the many cooperatives which already have more than one billion members. (Please see www.sarvodaya.org, www.ecovillage.org, www.transitionnetwork.org, www.grid.unep.ch/activities/assessment/geo/geo_cities.php, as well as the two attached documents – E/2010/NGO/29 and E/2011/NGO/126.)

Community members develop and use environmentally friendly technologies that embrace architecture, waste management, agricultural techniques, water conservation and other aspects of community life. They have a direct stake in caring for the fruits of nature and society in their care and are therefore acutely aware of the consequences of their actions.

Thanks to this sense of being responsible, they restore and regenerate the state of the environment in their immediate surroundings. Also, because all community members are the beneficiaries of the labour of the community as a whole, these commons are agents of both social cohesiveness and economic development from the grass roots upwards.

By increasing the health and productivity of their natural environment and the wealth of their own members, commons groups foster the two components on which all economies depend. They thereby increase both the goods and the health of the markets that are indispensable to business.

Their transparent, inclusive and participatory approaches to decision making enable personal fulfilment. Thus they create a much needed antidote to an economy fuelled by greed. At the same time they develop people’s capacity to play a constructive and supportive role for good governance, thereby providing governments with the very support without which they are unable to properly govern the areas under their jurisdiction.

The technologies, the participatory forms of decision making and the way commons groups manage their natural and social resources on a daily basis are the basic characteristics that set them apart from the faltering mainstream of our society (although many communities that fall into this category might not use the term, “commons,” to describe themselves).

Working in this way and using other unique inspirational practices, commons groups worldwide are forming a solid foundation for a future sustainable green economy – and not only in the locales in which they operate. Their methods and techniques can easily be transferred and adapted to most other parts of the world, both to cities and rural communities.

Our two previous emails detailed many other concrete examples of commons approaches that are helping to provide much-needed solutions to problems that are occurring worldwide. These cover the widest-possible spectrum and include areas such as agriculture, food production, land, waste and water management, peaceful conflict resolution, informational, educational and cultural needs, the use of local currencies to regenerate flagging local economies; and providing security, insurance and banking.

These commons have largely come into being as a way of coping with the need for goods and services that are required by all to survive and prosper but which are being placed beyond the reach of a rapidly increasing proportion of the world’s people.

In addition, because many of these commons are not limited by national, social, cultural, religious – and now, increasingly, economic – boundaries, they are empowering and enabling understanding, communication and collaboration between the commons communities that is proving to be indispensable to the well-being of nature and all people.

In other words, we are all benefitting from their efforts!

The Power of the Commons as a Tool for Social Change

The Internet’s social media such as FaceBook and Twitter (both for profit organizations and therefore not commons) are providing powerful tools for the formation of online commons communities and the organization of spontaneous new commons. These have played a decisive role in alerting governments and corporations when these two sectors are not working often by means of massive largely peaceful demonstrations. These dramatic events have emphasized that governments cannot govern without the support of their citizens and businesses cannot survive without the prosperity and support of their customers.

The thousands who in recent spontaneous gatherings harnessed social media to demonstrate peacefully against power politics and corporate greed acted as commoners in their decision making. Where they succeeded in maintaining commons approaches, they demonstrated the power of the commons ideal to create incisive global change toward forms of societies that work both for the “one percent” and the “99 percent.”

At the same time, where these demonstrations have made it hard for both governments and businesses to function, it is abundantly clear that the rate of breakdown of the environment, the economy and society increases rapidly where commons communities are not working harmoniously with well-functioning governments and businesses.

The above insights must be included in the Rio +20 Outcome Document.

It is important that governments and businesses think beyond taking measures primarily by themselves in response to our common global problems. Instead, they must recognize the indispensability and huge value of input by and cooperation with the world's citizens.

The Commons, the Public and the Private Sectors are interdependent and must therefore work together in such a way as to empower one another.

We have the means to reverse the breakdowns in the areas of the environment, the economy and society. Yet we can only be successful to the degree that the Commons, the Public and Private Sectors work together synergistically to inspire the negotiations leading up to Rio+20, the content of the Outcome Document of Rio+20 and the planning and financing of a subsequent shift to a commons-based global economy that has the benefit of input by and support of all stakeholders.

Signatories:

- The Association of World Citizens - The Institute for Planetary Synthesis
- Commons Action for the United Nations - Global Commons Trust
-The All-Win Network -Kosmos Associates
-Human Affect -Campaign2015+International
-Earth Rights Institute -Union for Land Value Taxation
-Climate Change Network Nigeria -CAFSO-WRAG for development Nigeria
-AlianzaClimate

For more information, please contact:

Dr. Lisinka Ulatowska info@worldcitizensaction.com or
Rob Wheeler robwheeler22@gmail.com.

 

From The Pachamama Alliance - Jon Love:

Related to U.N.CSD/2ISM New York, Dec. 15/16, 2011

#title# #name#,

We ask that Act With Absolute Urgency!
In the 20 years since the originally Earth Summit in Rio, governments have almost universally failed to meet their commitments and/or accomplish the goals laid forth in Agenda 21 and following documents.

Despite the agreements made in Rio in 1990, humanity remains on a completely unsustainable course. In the best models of future economic activity, as examined by MIT, anything like business as usual leads to atmospheric carbon levels that would almost certainly trigger catastrophic climate tipping points. (MIT published a paper assessing influence on climate change of different scenarios from IPCC, US Govt. Climate Change Science Program and Shell. See report 163, http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www) The “best possible scenario” of smooth transition to existing technologies and almost seamless cooperation of governments outcome produces 650 ppm carbon dioxide equivalent, well beyond any reputable “safe levels” of 350 or 450 or even the old conventional wisdom of 550.

The time for a complete “Remake” of humanity’s operating manual is NOW. There will never be a better window of opportunity. In fact we may never get the chance again.

We have the technology, the resources and working examples of the processes, industries, and economic and social systems that will avert these crises, as well as lay the groundwork for a global system in which everyone will prosper, while restoring the vital capacity of the natural ecosystems that we all depend upon for our food, water, and every aspect of robust commerce.

The window of time to implement these solutions is very short. Conservative estimates suggest that we have less than one decade to transcend the irreversible tipping points that "business as usual" has us accelerating toward. The time to confront the finite nature of the living systems of the planet to support a wasteful development paradigm is upon us.

WE DEMAND THAT YOU ACT WITH THE URGENCY THAT COMES WITH KNOWING THAT THE WELL-BEING OF ALL FUTURE GENERATIONS OF ALL SPECIES HANGS IN THE BALANCE.

Adopt a NEW WORLDVIEW
Recognize that the Earth’s Life System as a “Commons” that can not and should not be owned by any one entity, but must belong to all.

What is called for are genuinely transformative measures. As delegates entrusted with the fate of humanity (yes that’s the mandate you have been given!) we suggest that you consider that the view of the world that we have inherited from the last 400 to 500 years of reductive science and engineering has led us astray. The world is not a “clock” or a machine. It is not merely a vast materialistic puzzle to be figured out. Nature is not a realm separate from the idealized human realm which exists to do our bidding. We do not live in the insanely inaccurate model of unlimited resources and an unlimited waste depository that current economics assumes. We live in a real, live, vibrantly thriving eco-logy of life. Economy is, in fact Ecology.

Looking from the whole we can see that the life-giving systems have been thrown out of balance by human activity. We now need to restore that balance. It will take a truly restorative approach to act on behalf of the whole.

The perspective that we are asking that you, and we all, take is that of the whole. What we are asking is that you use one principle to judge the policies and agreements that you discuss, debate, support and adopt:

“Do I, in my deepest heart, from my highest self, believe this policy will lead toward a just, thriving, sustainable way of life for all?

WE DEMAND THAT YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE WHOLE – ALL OF HUMANITY, ALL OF LIFE, ALL OF TIME – TO THE VERY BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.

Listen to the best of “Civil Society”
There is a groundswell of small-scale, autonomous activity to address the issues we face. The existence of over 2 million NGO's, each addressing some aspect of the crises we face and the stunning opportunity before us is but one testimonial that a sea-change is underway.  A phenomenon with no central guidance, the imperative to take on our world as it is - and as it could be - has no parallel in history.

WE INVITE YOU TO PAY MORE ATTENTION TO THE VOICES OF THE PEOPLE, NGO’S AND TO REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE’S DELEGATIONS THAN TO THE SMALL SUBSET OF HUMANITY THAT IS REPRESENTED BY CORPORATE BOARDS OR HEADS OF STATE.

We ASK that you Support These Policies:

ON BEHALF OF THE WHOLE, WE REQUEST THAT THESE MEASURES BE ADOPTED AND INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENTS MADE AT RIO+20:

  1. Adopt as a fundamental principle the legal distinction of the Rights of Nature: the recognition that every eco-system, and the natural populations of all species that comprise them,  have the right to exist, to persist, and to thrive. A model for this can be found in the constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia.
  1. Make Ecocide, the environmental equivalent of Genocide, the 5th International Crime Against Peace alongside Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes of Aggression and War Crimes. A proposal has been put forward that defines ecocide as “The extensive destruction, damage to or loss of ecosystem(s) of a given territory, whether by human agency or by other causes, to such an extent that peaceful enjoyment by the inhabitants of that territory has been severely diminished.” Include in the criminal activity governments that engage in subsidizing ecocidal activities.
  1. Embrace and codify the recognition that the healthy natural living environment is a commons. From this commons all economic and commercial activity is afforded. It is a resource to be shared and stewarded by all nations and industries, all peoples and all markets. This commons we all share, and that shares itself with us is to be maintained and enhanced for the benefit of all.
  1. Create the legal structures that will require all commercial activity to be accountable for its impact on all communities that it affects, and for their operations that do affect us to be transparent.
  1. Create a new community-based money system that is not based on debt, and does not automatically accumulate wealth in the hands of those who issue currency. Follow the models put forth by BALLE and local alternative currencies.
  1. Adopt an enforceable policy granting indigenous communities the right of consent for development projects in their territories. The current “right of consultation” has proven ineffective.
  1. Mandate a transition to an equitable distribution of social goods – the wealth that is produced by all of us working together. Specifically limit the size of the gap between those who have the most and those who have the least. It may take time to achieve a restored balance in wealth around the world, but the current trend must be reversed.
  1. Transform the World Bank, IMF and UNDP into a new set of governance bodies that represent all people of earth equally to allocate the necessary resources to meet all of the millennium development goals. Put in place criteria to measure whether any proposed and ongoing activity is actually producing a thriving, just and sustainable way of life for all.
  1. Demand that the UN Security Council be replaced by a body of governance in the United Nations that represents Earth's people.

The above prescriptions are more than ambitious. They require us as a world community to act in concert and concern for one another as never before. The good news is that humanity is actually in the process of turning toward a thriving, just, sustainable way of life for all. There are two pathways, we can either go through collapse, or we can shift and thrive.

The opportunity you have is accelerate that process so that we take the high road of creative design, of collaboration and communion with Earth and our fellow creatures.

We are nowhere near plumbing the depths of the human soul, and our capacity to do what needs to be done, when it is clear that we must act. We have no idea how powerful we may be as human community. An unprecedented awareness that our fates are connected, and that the success of any one of us depends on the success of all, is arising. Information travels faster, and in more channels now that ever before, than ever though possible in our wildest dreams. And before lies the distinct possibility of truly creating a heaven on earth – a world that works for everybody.

Anyone participating in this Earth Summit has the opportunity to be part of making this possibility a reality.

As delegates participating in the decision-making bodies of this Summit, you have a chance to make history that will be celebrated for centuries to come. It is time to transform how we live with one another, and with all life on this one, irreplaceable home we call Earth.

Yours truly,
The Pachamama Alliance
Please refer questions, and correspondence to:
The Pachamama Alliance - Jon Love (jon@pachamama.org)

 

 

Those Letters were sended to:

Mr. Lhatu Wangchuk
Mr. Li Baodong
Mr. Luis Lithgow
Mr. Lumumba Stanislaus-Kaw Di-Aping
Mr. Macharia Kamau
Mr. Madhu Raman Acharya
Mr. Maged A. Abdelaziz
Mr. Magid Yousif Yahya Elhag
Mr. Manjeev Singh Puri
Mr. Manjeev Singh Puri
Mr. Manny Mori 
Mr. Mansour Ayyad SH A Alotaibi
Mr. Marco Antonio Suazo
Mr. Marcos Montilla
Mr. Mari Kiviniemi 
Mr. Mario Pescante
Mr. Mårten Grunditz
Mr. Maumoon Abdul Gayoom
Mr. Mauricio Funes 
Mr. Meron Reuben
Mr. Michel Tommo Monthe
Mr. Miguel Berger
Mr. Miguel Camilo Ruiz
Mr. Mikheil Saakashvili 
Mr. Milan Jaya Nyamrasjsingh Meetarbhan
Mr. Milan Milanović
Mr. Minas A. Hadjimichael
Mr. Mohamed Toihiri
Mr. Mohammad Khazaee
Mr. Mohammed Loulichki
Mr. Motlatsi Ramafole
Mr. Mourad Benmehidi
Mr. Najeem Sulaiman al-Abri
Mr. Narcís Casal de Fonsdeviela
Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser
Mr. Navin Ramgoolam 
Mr. Nawaf Salam
Mr. Nelson Messone
Mr. Néstor Osorio
Mr. Norachit Sinhaseni
Mr. Norman Harris
Mr. Norman Penke
Mr. Nouri Al Maliki 
Mr. Nurbek Jeenbaev
Mr. Octavio Errázuriz
Mr. Pablo Antonio Thalassinós
Mr. Pablo Solón
Mr. Pak Tok Hun
Mr. Palitha T.B. Kohona
Mr. Park In-kook
Mr. Patrick S. Mugoya
Mr. Paul Biya 
Mr. Pedro Núñez  Mosquera
Mr. Pedro Serrano
Mr. Peter Thomson
Mr. Peter Wittig
Mr. Philip Parham
Mr. Rafael Archondo
Mr. Raff Bukun-Olu Wole Onemola
Mr. Ratu Iloilo
Mr. Rayko S. Raytchev
Mr. Raymond Serge Balé
Mr. Raymond Serge Balé
Mr. Raymond Wolfe
Mr. Recep Tayyip Erdogan 
Mr. Riyad H. Mansour
Mr. Robert L. Shafer
Mr. Roble Olhaye
Mr. Rodolfo Eliseo Benítez Versón
Mr. Ronald Jean Jumeau
Mr. Roosevelt Skerrit 
Mr. Ruhakana Rugunda
Mr. Rupiah Banda 
Mr. Saad Hariri 
Mr. Said Mohamed Oussein
Mr. Sali Berisha 
Mr. Saul Weisleder
Mr. Saviour F. Borg
Mr. Saviour F. Borg
Mr. Sebastián Piñera 
Mr. Serzh Sargsyan 
Mr. Shigeki Sumi
Mr. Shin Boo-nam
Mr. Shin Dong Ik
Mr. Sin Son Ho
Mr. Sirodjidin M. Aslov
Mr. Sirodjidin M. Aslov
Mr. Sonatane T. Taumoepeau-Tupou
Mr. Stephen Harper 
Mr. Stuart Beck
Mr. Tawfeeq Ahmed Almansoor
Mr. Tekeda Alemu
Mr. Thomas Adoumasse
Mr. Thomas Klestil
Mr. Tigran Sargsyan 
Mr. Vaclav Havel
Mr. Valdis Zatlers 
Mr. Vanu Gopala Menon
Mr. Viktor Orbán 
Mr. Viktor Yanukovych 
Mr. Vladimir Putin
Mr. Wang Min
Mr. Werner Faymann 
Mr. Wilfried I. Emvula
Mr. Witold Sobków
Mr. Wu Denyih
Mr. Yahya A. Mahmassani
Mr. Yayi Boni 
Mr. Youssoufou Bamba
Mr. Yves Leterme Caretaker 
Mr. Zahir Tanin
Mr. Zina Andrianarivelo-Razafy
Mr. Zlatko B. Dimitroff
Mr. Zwelethu Mnisi
Mr. Zwelethu Mnisi
Mrs. Byrganym Aitimova
Mrs. Heidi Schroderus-Fox
Mrs. Isabelle F. Picco
Mrs. Janine Elizabeth Coye-Felson
Mrs. Janine Elizabeth Coye-Felson
Mrs. Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir 
Mrs. Josephine Ojiambo
Mrs. María Rubiales de Chamorro
Mrs. Marianne Odette Bibalou
Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Flores
Mrs. Mary Morgan-Moss
Mrs. Simona Mirela Miculescu
Mrs. Simona Mirela Miculescu
Mrs. Sofia Mesquita Borges
Mrs. Susan Waffa-Ogoo
Mrs. U. Joy Ogwu
Ms. Abdulkalam Abdul Momen
Ms. Abdulkalam Abdul Momen
Ms. Anne Anderson
Ms. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner 
Ms. Dalia Grybauskaite 
Ms. Dessima M. Williams
Ms. Enkhtsetseg Ochir
Ms. Iveta Radicová 
Ms. Laisenia Qarase
Ms. Marlene Moses
Ms. Mary McAleese 
Ms. Paulette A. Bethel
Ms. Rosemary A. DiCarlo
Ms. Sanja Štiglic
Ms. Signe Burgstaller
Ms. Susan E. Rice
Mswati III 
Nikola Špiric 
Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein
Rafael Correa 
Sheikh Hasina Wazed 
Sir Mark Lyall Grant
  GLOBAL
  Afghanistan
  Albania
  Algeria
  American Samoa
  Andorra
  Angola
  Anguilla
  Antigua and Barbuda
  Argentina
  Armenia
  Aruba
  Australia
  Austria
  Azerbaijan
  Bahamas, The
  Bahrain
  Bangladesh
  Barbados
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Belize
  Benin
  Bermuda
  Bhutan
  Bolivia
  Bosnia and Herzegovina
  Botswana
  Brazil
  British Virgin Islands
  Brunei
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Burma
  Burundi
  Cambodia
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Cayman Islands
  Central African Republic
  Chad
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Comoros
  Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  Congo, Republic of the
  Cook Islands
  Costa Rica
  Cote d'Ivoire
  Croatia
  Cuba
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Djibouti
  Dominica
  Dominican Republic
  East Timor
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  El Salvador
  Equatorial Guinea
  Eritrea
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)
  Faroe Islands
  Fiji
  Finland
  France
  French Guiana
  French Polynesia
  Gabon
  Gambia, The
  Gaza Strip
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Gibraltar
  Greece
  Greenland
  Grenada
  Guadeloupe
  Guam
  Guatemala
  Guernsey
  Guinea
  Guinea-Bissau
  Guyana
  Haiti
  Honduras
  Hong Kong
  Hungary
  Iceland
  India
  Indonesia
  Iran
  Iraq
  Ireland
  Israel
  Italy
  Jamaica
  Japan
  Jersey
  Jordan
  Kazakhstan
  Kenya
  Kiribati
  Korea, North
  Korea, South
  Kuwait
  Kyrgyzstan
  Laos
  Latvia
  Lebanon
  Lesotho
  Liberia
  Libya
  Liechtenstein
  Lithuania
  Luxembourg
  Macau
  Macedonia
  Madagascar
  Malawi
  Malaysia
  Maldives
  Mali
  Malta
  Man, Isle of
  Marshall Islands
  Martinique
  Mauritania
  Mauritius
  Mayotte
  Mexico
  Micronesia
  Moldova
  Monaco
  Mongolia
  Montserrat
  Morocco
  Mozambique
  Namibia
  Nauru
  Nepal
  Netherlands
  Netherlands Antilles
  New Caledonia
  New Zealand
  Nicaragua
  Niger
  Nigeria
  Niue
  Northern Mariana Islands
  Norway
  Oman
  Pakistan
  Palau
  Panama
  Papua New Guinea
  Paraguay
  Peru
  Philippines
  Poland
  Portugal
  Puerto Rico
  Qatar
  Reunion
  Romania
  Russia
  Rwanda
  Saint Helena
  Saint Kitts and Nevis
  Saint Lucia
  Saint Pierre and Miquelon
  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  Samoa
  San Marino
  Sao Tome and Principe
  Saudi Arabia
  Senegal
  Serbia and Montenegro
  Seychelles
  Sierra Leone
  Singapore
  Slovakia
  Slovenia
  Solomon Islands
  Somalia
  South Africa
  Spain
  Sri Lanka
  Sudan
  Suriname
  Swaziland
  Sweden
  Switzerland
  Syria
  Taiwan
  Tajikistan
  Tanzania
  Thailand
  Togo
  Tokelau
  Tonga
  Trinidad and Tobago
  Tunisia
  Turkey
  Turkmenistan
  Turks and Caicos Islands
  Tuvalu
  Uganda
  Ukraine
  United Arab Emirates
  United Kingdom
  United States of America
  Uruguay
  Uzbekistan
  Vanuatu
  Venezuela
  Vietnam
  Virgin Islands
  Wallis and Futuna
  West Bank
  Yemen
  Zambia
  Zimbabwe
    ghc1    
         
(C) SBF-Vipcure.org mail@globalhumancommons.org Skype video contact address: sbfemile

Chambers of Commerce

Support by Essence-SUM